By Unknown Author
Information on sales in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.
Published: November 15, 2014 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1F97xAe
via IFTTT
By Unknown Author
Information on sales in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.
Published: November 15, 2014 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1F97xAe
via IFTTT
By LISA PREVOST
The Urban Institute questions the effectiveness of a proposal for a low-cost, 15-year mortgage intended to help low- and middle-income borrowers build equity.
Published: November 22, 2014 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1uFb58L
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
AUSTIN, TX – U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Secretary Julián Castro today announced funding available to help local communities across the country to redevelop severely distressed public and HUD-assisted housing and transform surrounding neighborhoods. This funding is subject to increase if there is an FY2015 appropriation. Part of the Obama Administration’s effort to build Ladders of Opportunity to the middle class, HUD is offering grants of up to $30 million through its Choice Neighborhoods Implementation Program to support locally driven solutions for transforming neighborhoods struggling to address poor quality housing, inadequate schools, poor health, high crime, and lack of capital.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1tlRhDC
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Census Bureau today announced the following new residential construction statistics for October 2014.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1tlRfvt
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today released its annual report to Congress on the financial condition of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Mutual Mortgage Insurance (MMI) Fund. The independent actuarial report shows that FHA’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund (MMIF) has improved going from a negative value to a growth of $21 billion within two years. Read a comprehensive summary of the report released today.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1AoBPyZ
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
For release:
November 18, 2014
Low mortgage rates fail to perk California home sales in October
Bay Area continues to experience low inventory and strong price and sales growth
LOS ANGELES (Nov. 18) – The lowest mortgage rates in 18 months failed to spark the California housing market in October as sales stayed flat and home prices increased at the slowest pace since early 2012, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
Closed escrow sales of existing, single-family detached homes in California totaled a seasonally adjusted annualized rate of 396,220 units in October, according to information collected by C.A.R. from more than 90 local REALTOR® associations and MLSs statewide. Sales in October were unchanged from a revised 396,400 in September but were down 1.9 percent from a revised 404,000 in October 2013. October marked a full year that sales were below the 400,000 level. The statewide sales figure represents what would be the total number of homes sold during 2014 if sales maintained the October pace throughout the year. It is adjusted to account for seasonal factors that typically influence home sales.
"As we move into the off-peak home buying season, prospective buyers who may have delayed their purchase earlier in the year should take advantage of the current favorable market conditions and resume their home search," said 2015 C.A.R. President Chris Kutzkey. "With home prices stabilizing and interest rates dropping back down to levels not seen since mid-last year, housing affordability should improve to benefit buyers."
The median price of an existing, single-family detached California home decreased 2.3 percent from September’s median price of $461,370 to $450,620 in October but was up 5.4 percent from the revised $427,540 recorded in October 2013. The statewide median home price has been higher on a year-over-year basis for more than two years. The median sales price is the point at which half of homes sold for more and half sold for less; it is influenced by the types of homes selling as well as a general change in values.
"While home sales essentially were unchanged statewide, there were pockets of strong sales growth, especially in coastal regions. The Bay Area, for example, continued to exhibit strong price gains, decent sales growth, and extremely low housing inventory," said C.A.R. Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young. "If current price and rate conditions persist, overall home sales should improve for the rest of the year."
Other key facts from C.A.R.’s October 2014 resale housing report include:
• Housing inventory slipped in October, with the available supply of existing, single-family detached homes for sale dropping from 4.2 months in September to 3.8 months in October. The index was a revised 3.3 months in October 2013. The index indicates the number of months needed to sell the supply of homes on the market at the current sales rate. A six- to seven-month supply is considered typical in a normal market.
• The median number of days it took to sell a single-family home edged up in October, up from a revised 40 days in September to 41.9 days in October and from 33.4 days in October 2013.
• According to C.A.R.’s newest housing market indicator measuring sales-to-list price ratio*, multiple bid offers for properties has waned, and properties are again generally selling below the list price. The statewide measure suggests that homes are selling at 97.5 percent of the list price. This is down from a 99.1% ratio at the same time last year. The Bay Area is the only region where homes are selling above list prices and are generally selling about 1.3 percent more than asking price.
• The median price per square foot** for an existing single-family California home was $216 in October 2014, an increase of 0.2 percent from the previous month and a 6.4 percent increase from October 2013. Price per square foot at the state level has been showing an upward trend since early 2012. In fact, it has been rising on a year-over-year basis for 33 consecutive months. San Mateo County had the highest price per square foot in October with $659/sq. ft., followed by Santa Clara ($521/sq. ft.), and Santa Cruz ($399/sq. ft.). The top three counties with the lowest price per square foot in October were Siskiyou ($104/sq. ft.), Glenn ($110/sq. ft.), and Madera ($111/sq. ft.).
• Mortgage rates fell in October, with the 30-year, fixed-mortgage interest rate averaging 4.04 percent, down from 4.16 percent in September and down from 4.19 percent in October 2013, according to Freddie Mac. The October 2014 average 30-year fixed rate was the lowest since May 2013, just before the Federal Reserve announced its intention to taper the bond buying program. Adjustable-mortgage interest rates in October also fell, averaging 2.41 percent, down from 2.43 percent in September and down from 2.63 percent in October 2013.
Graphics (click links to open):
• October sales at-a-glance infographic.
• Unsold Inventory by price range.
• Change in sales by price range.
• Share of sales by price range.
Note: The County MLS median price and sales data in the tables are generated from a survey of more than 90 associations of REALTORS® throughout the state, and represent statistics of existing single-family detached homes only. County sales data are not adjusted to account for seasonal factors that can influence home sales. Movements in sales prices should not be interpreted as changes in the cost of a standard home. The median price is where half sold for more and half sold for less; medians are more typical than average prices, which are skewed by a relatively small share of transactions at either the lower-end or the upper-end. Median prices can be influenced by changes in cost, as well as changes in the characteristics and the size of homes sold. Due to the low sales volume in some areas, median price changes in October exhibit unusual fluctuation. The change in median prices should not be construed as actual price changes in specific homes.
*Sales-to-list price ratio is an indicator that reflects the negotiation power of home buyers and home sellers under current market conditions. The ratio is calculated by dividing the final sales price of a property by its last list price and is expressed as a percentage. A sales-to-list ratio with 100 percent or above suggests that the property sold for more than the list price, and a ratio below 100 percent indicates that the price sold below the asking price.
**Price per square foot is a measure commonly used by real estate agents and brokers to determine how much a square foot of space a buyer will pay for a property. It is calculated as the sale price of the home divided by the number of finished square feet. C.A.R. currently tracks price-per-square foot statistics for 33 counties.
Leading the way?® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with 165,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
October 2014 County Sales and Price Activity
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
October-14 |
Median Sold Price of Existing Single-Family Homes | Sales | |||||||
State/Region/County |
Oct-14 |
Sep-14 |
Oct-13 |
MTM% Chg |
YTY% Chg |
MTM% Chg |
YTY% Chg |
||
CA SFH (SAAR) | $450,620 | $461,370 | r | $427,540 | r | -2.3% | 5.4% | 0.0% | -1.9% |
CA Condo/Townhomes | $374,480 | $369,180 | r | $349,810 | r | 1.4% | 7.1% | 2.5% | -2.6% |
Los Angeles Metro Area | $412,860 | $413,730 | r | $392,610 | r | -0.2% | 5.2% | 8.6% | -2.3% |
Inland Empire | $274,950 | $275,160 | r | $257,560 | r | -0.1% | 6.8% | 2.7% | 1.6% |
S.F. Bay Area | $760,610 | $730,240 | $671,490 | r | 4.2% | 13.3% | 8.6% | -2.6% | |
S.F. Bay Area |
|||||||||
Alameda | $706,280 | $675,430 | $618,930 | 4.6% | 14.1% | 5.9% | -7.5% | ||
Contra-Costa (Cty.) | $721,590 | $742,520 | $647,920 | r | -2.8% | 11.4% | 18.6% | 13.1% | |
Marin | $969,700 | $1,151,040 | $959,740 | -15.8% | 1.0% | 24.0% | -1.3% | ||
Napa | $599,140 | $633,930 | $497,730 | -5.5% | 20.4% | 7.3% | -1.9% | ||
San Francisco | $986,260 | $950,340 | $844,510 | 3.8% | 16.8% | 36.5% | 4.5% | ||
San Mateo | $1,071,000 | $1,075,000 | $910,000 | -0.4% | 17.7% | 8.3% | -6.1% | ||
Santa Clara | $870,000 | $850,000 | $770,000 | 2.4% | 13.0% | 4.8% | -2.2% | ||
Solano | $327,460 | $328,040 | $294,920 | -0.2% | 11.0% | 5.5% | -9.5% | ||
Sonoma | $487,930 | $496,400 | $469,900 | -1.7% | 3.8% | -10.9% | -9.6% | ||
Southern California |
|||||||||
Los Angeles | $477,600 | $486,030 | $447,130 | -1.7% | 6.8% | 17.0% | -5.4% | ||
Orange County | $692,390 | $696,190 | $660,070 | r | -0.5% | 4.9% | -0.5% | -0.8% | |
Riverside County | $322,700 | $316,500 | $296,640 | 2.0% | 8.8% | 0.1% | -1.0% | ||
San Bernardino | $208,080 | $212,790 | r | $191,330 | r | -2.2% | 8.8% | 6.8% | 5.6% |
San Diego | $493,030 | $519,420 | $477,130 | -5.1% | 3.3% | 1.8% | -6.8% | ||
Ventura | $583,810 | $589,080 | $538,740 | -0.9% | 8.4% | 12.9% | -3.5% | ||
Central Coast |
|||||||||
Monterey | $460,000 | $451,000 | $412,000 | 2.0% | 11.7% | 15.5% | 23.6% | ||
San Luis Obispo | $455,660 | $480,640 | $440,380 | -5.2% | 3.5% | 13.2% | 11.3% | ||
Santa Barbara | $570,000 | $778,230 | $613,640 | -26.8% | -7.1% | -2.6% | 0.0% | ||
Santa Cruz | $715,000 | $670,000 | $650,000 | 6.7% | 10.0% | -11.6% | -1.2% | ||
Central Valley |
|||||||||
Fresno | $200,600 | $208,210 | $182,620 | -3.7% | 9.8% | 4.2% | -1.0% | ||
Glenn | $167,500 | $147,500 | $125,000 | 13.6% | 34.0% | -10.5% | 30.8% | ||
Kern (Bakersfield) | $215,000 | $215,000 | r | $185,000 | 0.0% | 16.2% | 3.0% | -5.5% | |
Kings County | $168,670 | $183,330 | $181,000 | -8.0% | -6.8% | -13.1% | 5.8% | ||
Madera | $166,000 | $156,670 | $153,330 | 6.0% | 8.3% | 53.3% | -36.1% | ||
Merced | $190,710 | $159,500 | $171,820 | 19.6% | 11.0% | 0.0% | -8.0% | ||
Placer County | $380,170 | $384,850 | $364,150 | -1.2% | 4.4% | 0.6% | 11.6% | ||
Sacramento | $270,150 | $276,960 | $253,560 | -2.5% | 6.5% | -1.0% | 0.1% | ||
San Benito | $435,000 | $424,000 | $397,500 | 2.6% | 9.4% | 21.6% | -2.2% | ||
San Joaquin | $263,270 | $265,400 | $234,160 | -0.8% | 12.4% | 7.6% | -8.2% | ||
Stanislaus | $228,630 | $230,000 | $209,110 | -0.6% | 9.3% | 7.1% | -8.7% | ||
Tulare | $179,060 | $175,000 | $161,330 | 2.3% | 11.0% | 9.6% | 3.7% | ||
Other Counties in California |
|||||||||
Amador | $265,000 | $225,000 | $198,000 | 17.8% | 33.8% | 7.9% | 24.2% | ||
Butte County | $247,580 | $258,650 | $248,330 | -4.3% | -0.3% | 36.5% | 35.3% | ||
Calaveras | $245,000 | $238,000 | $225,000 | 2.9% | 8.9% | -4.6% | 7.8% | ||
Del Norte | $160,000 | $138,000 | $176,600 | 15.9% | -9.4% | 11.8% | -17.4% | ||
El Dorado County | $355,800 | $364,650 | $367,390 | -2.4% | -3.2% | 12.3% | 7.7% | ||
Humboldt | $260,340 | $246,050 | $260,530 | 5.8% | -0.1% | 26.4% | 31.0% | ||
Lake County | $190,000 | $180,000 | $196,250 | 5.6% | -3.2% | 5.2% | -14.1% | ||
Tuolumne | $219,640 | $215,910 | $200,000 | 1.7% | 9.8% | 37.7% | 21.7% | ||
Mendocino | $337,500 | $307,690 | $255,000 | 9.7% | 32.4% | 14.3% | -4.0% | ||
Nevada | $323,000 | $322,500 | $319,000 | 0.2% | 1.3% | 46.1% | 13.3% | ||
Plumas | $242,000 | $270,000 | $250,000 | -10.4% | -3.2% | 20.5% | 27.0% | ||
Shasta | $220,920 | $222,550 | $208,540 | -0.7% | 5.9% | 2.3% | 17.6% | ||
Siskiyou County | $161,670 | $155,000 | $156,670 | 4.3% | 3.2% | -3.1% | 0.0% | ||
Sutter | $213,240 | $206,820 | r | $199,090 | r | 3.1% | 7.1% | 6.2% | 13.1% |
Tehama | $160,000 | $166,670 | $142,500 | -4.0% | 12.3% | 43.8% | 119.0% | ||
Yolo | $344,740 | $344,230 | $311,290 | 0.1% | 10.7% | -5.8% | -21.4% | ||
Yuba | $210,940 | $219,440 | r | $195,710 | r | -3.9% | 7.8% | 13.2% | 14.9% |
r = revised
NA = not available
October 2014 County Unsold Inventory and Time on Market
(Regional and condo sales data not seasonally adjusted)
October-14 | Unsold Inventory Index | Median Time on Market | ||||||||
State/Region/County |
Oct-14 |
Sep-14 |
Oct-13 |
Oct-14 |
Sep-14 |
Oct-13 |
||||
CA SFH (SAAR) | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.3 | r | 41.9 | 40.0 | r | 33.4 | ||
CA Condo/Townhomes | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 41.3 | 40.3 | r | 31.9 | r | ||
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 51.7 | 49.9 | 40.7 | ||||
Inland Empire | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.1 | r | 53.9 | 51.0 | r | 37.2 | ||
S.F. Bay Area | 2.2 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 38.7 | 39.5 | r | 38.2 | r | ||
S.F. Bay Area |
||||||||||
Alameda | 2.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 49.5 | 49.8 | 50.0 | ||||
Contra-Costa (Central County) | 2.4 | 2.9 | 2.0 | r | 54.2 | 52.3 | 53.0 | r | ||
Marin | 2.5 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 38.9 | 45.2 | 38.4 | ||||
Napa | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 64.8 | 64.4 | 49.0 | ||||
San Francisco | 2.0 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 22.5 | 23.1 | 25.1 | ||||
San Mateo | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 19.5 | 19.9 | 19.4 | ||||
Santa Clara | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 20.9 | 21.1 | 21.4 | ||||
Solano | 2.4 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 45.0 | 46.3 | 38.0 | ||||
Sonoma | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 50.2 | 48.4 | 48.1 | ||||
Southern California |
||||||||||
Los Angeles | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 45.5 | 45.1 | 35.7 | ||||
Orange County | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 62.3 | 57.3 | 54.5 | ||||
Riverside County | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 56.7 | 53.5 | 38.1 | ||||
San Bernardino | 4.5 | 4.8 | r | 3.7 | r | 49.6 | 47.0 | r | 35.7 | r |
San Diego | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 28.3 | 26.9 | 28.1 | ||||
Ventura | 4.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 | 63.0 | 59.2 | 49.1 | ||||
Central Coast |
||||||||||
Monterey | 3.8 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 26.2 | 26.1 | 26.8 | ||||
San Luis Obispo | 4.3 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 50.2 | 46.7 | 27.5 | ||||
Santa Barbara | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 41.5 | 37.3 | 33.8 | ||||
Santa Cruz | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 33.7 | 27.6 | 27.1 | ||||
Central Valley |
||||||||||
Fresno | 4.9 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 29.4 | 27.1 | 24.3 | ||||
Glenn | 5.5 | 5.5 | 6.7 | 47.9 | 33.9 | 69.7 | ||||
Kern (Bakersfield) | 3.6 | 3.7 | 2.8 | r | 28.0 | 27.0 | r | 18.0 | r | |
Kings County | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 44.5 | 41.9 | 32.3 | ||||
Madera | 4.9 | 7.1 | 2.9 | 23.2 | 41.9 | 28.5 | ||||
Merced | 3.9 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 46.3 | 34.0 | 23.1 | ||||
Placer County | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.2 | 29.6 | 27.0 | 24.7 | ||||
Sacramento | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 25.8 | 23.9 | 21.6 | ||||
San Benito | 3.7 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 40.2 | 24.3 | 24.8 | ||||
San Joaquin | 3.4 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 25.5 | 23.4 | 20.9 | ||||
Stanislaus | 3.5 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 25.2 | 24.0 | 20.4 | ||||
Tulare | 4.4 | 4.9 | 4.0 | 42.8 | 36.2 | 28.6 | ||||
Other Counties in California |
||||||||||
Amador | 5.9 | 6.8 | 5.6 | 65.8 | 64.6 | 28.9 | ||||
Butte County | 3.1 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 35.8 | 29.8 | 45.0 | ||||
Calaveras | 6.7 | 6.9 | 6.2 | 59.0 | 72.0 | 62.0 | ||||
Del Norte | 9.5 | 11.6 | 7.3 | 106.0 | 103.0 | 78.0 | ||||
El Dorado County | 4.3 | 5.2 | 4.4 | 55.1 | 55.2 | 42.2 | ||||
Humboldt | 5.4 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 52.4 | 45.5 | 32.9 | ||||
Lake County | 7.2 | 8.3 | 5.5 | 80.0 | 58.7 | 75.5 | ||||
Tuolumne | 6.0 | 9.0 | 7.3 | 73.3 | 72.6 | 29.5 | ||||
Mendocino | 7.4 | 9.0 | 6.9 | 91.0 | 57.8 | 73.4 | ||||
Nevada | 5.4 | 8.4 | 5.1 | 50.0 | 51.0 | 44.0 | ||||
Plumas | 8.1 | 11.4 | 7.5 | 174.0 | 151.0 | 158.0 | ||||
Shasta | 5.5 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 56.1 | 42.0 | 27.2 | ||||
Siskiyou County | 12.4 | 12.6 | 11.2 | 45.5 | 38.3 | 93.9 | ||||
Sutter | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.0 | r | 24.8 | 48.1 | r | 21.6 | r | |
Tehama | 4.7 | 7.4 | 9.4 | 41.2 | 61.0 | 41.9 | ||||
Yolo | 3.4 | 3.5 | 2.6 | 23.3 | 26.4 | 21.8 | ||||
Yuba | 2.9 | 3.9 | r | 2.9 | r | 40.0 | 28.4 | r | 26.6 | r |
r = revised
NA = not available
Vía Home http://ift.tt/1qAL1xd
http://ift.tt/1uDRmGn
This video, 38 minutes in total, contains the initial statements, issue identification, and cross-talk from a mediation demonstration. The National Association has prepared this mediation…
|
Views:
1 0
ratings |
|
Time: 37:46 |
More in Nonprofits & Activism |
Vía Uploads by NAREALTORS http://ift.tt/1uDRjKS
http://ift.tt/1xWRsLv
This video, 38 minutes in total, contains the initial statements, issue identification, and cross-talk from a mediation demonstration. The National Association has prepared this mediation…
|
Views:
0 0
ratings |
|
Time: 37:46 |
More in Nonprofits & Activism |
Vía Uploads by NAREALTORS http://ift.tt/1x5dl7E
By JOYCE COHEN
Chrissy Hunt and Sean Oliver went looking for an newer apartment in Manhattan and Brooklyn.
Published: November 22, 2014 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1yXhNr8
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON (November 20, 2014) – Existing-home sales rose in October for the second straight month and are now above year-over-year levels for the first time in a year, according to the National Association of Realtors®.
Total existing-home sales1, which are completed transactions that include single-family homes, townhomes, condominiums and… Read More
Vía RSS feed for Items tagged ‘news releases + for-the-media’ http://ift.tt/1ueAB0S