By MIKE POWELL
This week’s properties include a stone house in Catskill, N.Y., an 1854 house in Montgomery, Tex., and a contemporary in Salt Lake City.
Published: February 16, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/218uXk2
via IFTTT
By MIKE POWELL
This week’s properties include a stone house in Catskill, N.Y., an 1854 house in Montgomery, Tex., and a contemporary in Salt Lake City.
Published: February 16, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/218uXk2
via IFTTT
By Unknown Author
This changing neighborhood, known for its vintage townhouses, is also seeing large-scale development.
Published: February 20, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1Wr4WJw
via IFTTT
By FRAN HAWTHORNE
As construction at Pacific Park Brooklyn continues, even more change is coming to the neighborhood.
Published: February 20, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1SRVWiS
via IFTTT
By VIVIAN MARINO
Brian Ezra is a founding principal of Avery Hall Investments, a residential developer focused on Brooklyn.
Published: February 16, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1oo5JjY
via IFTTT
By ROSALIE R. RADOMSKY
Recent commercial real estate transactions in New York City.
Published: February 16, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/248ABVX
via IFTTT
By JOE GOSE
A $100 million project will transform a landmark department store into luxury apartments, a hotel, retailing, restaurants and entertainment venues.
Published: February 16, 2016 at 09:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/1U5GkYc
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON Today, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced $55.5 million to 75 Native American communities throughout the country to improve housing conditions and stimulate community development, including construction projects and local jobs for low- and moderate-income families.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1PAiOiL
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON – U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro today announced HUD is allocating more $1.8 billion to public housing authorities in all 50 states, as well as the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to make needed capital improvements in their properties.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1Tm3UAo
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today unveiled President Obama’s proposed HUD Budget for Fiscal Year 2017 which is focused on helping Americans to secure and maintain, affordable housing, ending homelessness, making our communities more resilient from natural disasters and protecting people from housing discrimination
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/1PAiO2r
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
For release:
February 11, 2016
California housing affordability edges up from third quarter; slips from year ago
Sixteen regions see improvements, with Contra Costa, Los Angeles, Alameda, Sonoma, and San Joaquin counties leading the way
LOS ANGELES (Feb. 11) – Lower interest rates and level home prices combined to perk up California housing affordability in the fourth quarter of 2015, compared to the previous quarter, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today. Affordability, however, was down when compared to the previous year.
The percentage of home buyers who could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in fourth-quarter 2015 ticked up to 30 percent from the 29 percent recorded in the third quarter of 2015 but was down from 31 percent in fourth-quarter 2014, according to C.A.R.’s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI). This is the 11th consecutive quarter that the index has been below 40 percent and is near the mid-2008 low level of 29 percent. California’s housing affordability index hit a peak of 56 percent in the first quarter of 2012.
C.A.R.’s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The Index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.
Home buyers needed to earn a minimum annual income of $96,640 to qualify for the purchase of a $483,050 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the fourth quarter of 2015. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $2,420, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 4.07 percent. The effective composite interest rate in third-quarter 2015 was 4.16 percent and 4.20 percent in the fourth quarter of 2014.
The median home price was $488,540 in third-quarter 2015, and an annual income of $98,580 was needed to purchase a home at that price.
Unchanged from the previous quarter and year, 39 percent of California households earned the minimum income to qualify for the purchase of a condominium or townhome in the last quarter of 2015. An annual income of $78,720 was required to make monthly payments of $1,970.
Key points from the fourth-quarter 2015 Housing Affordability report include:
• Compared to affordability in third-quarter 2015, 16 counties saw an improvement in housing affordability, five experienced declines, and six were unchanged.
• Regionally, affordability improved slightly across the state with affordability gains mostly in the higher-priced areas, while less expensive regions experienced minimal effects due to level home prices.
• Alameda, Contra Costa, Sonoma, Los Angeles, and San Joaquin counties saw the greatest quarter-to-quarter improvement in housing affordability due to flat home prices and lower interest rates.
• During the fourth quarter of 2015, the five most affordable counties in California were Kings (61 percent), Merced (55 percent), San Bernardino (53 percent), Tulare (54 percent), and Fresno (49 percent).
• San Francisco (11 percent), San Mateo (14 percent), and Marin (17 percent), counties were the least affordable areas of the state.
Housing Affordability slides (click link to open)
Affordability peak versus current
Annual income peak versus current
PITI peak versus current
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
C.A.R. Region |
Housing Affordability Index |
Median Home Price |
Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance |
Minimum Qualifying Income |
CA SFH (SAAR) | 30 |
$ 483,050 |
$ 2,420 |
$ 96,640 |
CA Condo/Townhomes | 39 |
$ 393,470 |
$ 1,970 |
$ 78,720 |
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 32 |
$ 442,830 |
$ 2,210 |
$ 88,600 |
Inland Empire | 45 |
$ 295,550 |
$ 1,480 |
$ 59,130 |
S.F. Bay Area | 24 |
$ 735,170 |
$ 3,680 |
$ 147,080 |
United States | 58 |
$ 222,700 |
$ 1,110 |
$ 44,550 |
S.F. Bay Area |
||||
Alameda | 22 |
$ 728,160 |
$ 3,640 |
$ 145,680 |
Contra-Costa (Central County) | 37 |
$ 526,550 |
$ 2,630 |
$ 105,350 |
Marin | 17 |
$ 1,171,340 |
$ 5,860 |
$ 234,350 |
Napa | 21 |
$ 655,940 |
$ 3,280 |
$ 131,230 |
San Francisco | 11 |
$ 1,270,110 |
$ 6,350 |
$ 254,110 |
San Mateo | 14 |
$ 1,195,000 |
$ 5,980 |
$ 239,080 |
Santa Clara | 20 |
$ 940,000 |
$ 4,700 |
$ 188,060 |
Solano | 45 |
$ 355,900 |
$ 1,780 |
$ 71,200 |
Sonoma | 26 |
$ 551,340 |
$ 2,760 |
$ 110,300 |
Southern California |
||||
Los Angeles | 27 |
$ 481,940 |
$ 2,410 |
$ 96,420 |
Orange County | 21 |
$ 708,700 |
$ 3,540 |
$ 141,790 |
Riverside County | 39 |
$ 340,260 |
$ 1,700 |
$ 68,070 |
San Bernardino | 53 |
$ 233,730 |
$ 1,170 |
$ 46,760 |
San Diego | 25 |
$ 546,770 |
$ 2,730 |
$ 109,390 |
Ventura | 26 |
$ 608,430 |
$ 3,040 |
$ 121,730 |
Central Coast |
||||
Monterey | 25 |
$ 500,950 |
$ 2,510 |
$ 100,220 |
San Luis Obispo | 26 |
$ 541,990 |
$ 2,710 |
$ 108,430 |
Santa Barbara | 23 |
$ 607,880 |
$ 3,040 |
$ 121,620 |
Santa Cruz | 21 |
$ 720,000 |
$ 3,600 |
$ 144,050 |
Central Valley |
||||
Fresno | 49 |
$ 219,960 |
$ 1,100 |
$ 44,010 |
Kings County | 61 |
$ 190,970 |
$ 960 |
$ 38,210 |
Madera | 48 |
$ 220,830 |
$ 1,100 |
$ 44,180 |
Merced | 55 |
$ 205,190 |
$ 1,030 |
$ 41,050 |
Placer County | 44 |
$ 394,770 |
$ 1,970 |
$ 78,980 |
Sacramento | 46 |
$ 294,050 |
$ 1,470 |
$ 58,830 |
San Joaquin | 38 |
$ 284,820 |
$ 1,420 |
$ 56,980 |
Stanislaus | 40 |
$ 253,320 |
$ 1,270 |
$ 50,680 |
Tulare | 54 |
$ 189,300 |
$ 950 |
$ 37,870 |
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
STATE/REGION/COUNTY |
Q4 2015 |
Q3 2015 |
Q4 2014 |
||
CA SFH (SAAR) | 30 | 29 | 31 | ||
CA Condo/Townhomes | 39 | 39 | R | 39 | |
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 32 | 31 | 34 | ||
Inland Empire | 45 | 45 | 47 | ||
S.F. Bay Area | 24 | 22 | R | 21 | |
United States | 58 | 56 | 59 | ||
S.F. Bay Area |
|||||
Alameda | 22 | 20 | 20 | ||
Contra-Costa | 37 | 34 | R | 40 | R |
Marin | 17 | 19 | 15 | ||
Napa | 21 | 21 | 24 | ||
San Francisco | 11 | 10 | 11 | R | |
San Mateo | 14 | 13 | 15 | ||
Santa Clara | 20 | 19 | 22 | ||
Solano | 45 | 44 | 50 | ||
Sonoma | 26 | 24 | 29 | ||
Southern California |
|||||
Los Angeles | 27 | 24 | 28 | ||
Orange County | 21 | 20 | 21 | ||
Riverside County | 39 | 39 | 41 | ||
San Bernardino | 53 | 54 | 57 | ||
San Diego | 25 | 24 | 27 | ||
Ventura | 26 | 25 | 29 | ||
Central Coast |
|||||
Monterey | 25 | 27 | 27 | ||
San Luis Obispo | 26 | 27 | 26 | ||
Santa Barbara | 23 | 18 | 21 | ||
Santa Cruz | 21 | 19 | 17 | ||
Central Valley |
|||||
Fresno | 49 | 49 | 53 | ||
Kings County | 61 | 60 | 64 | ||
Madera | 48 | 49 | 50 | R | |
Merced | 55 | 55 | 53 | ||
Placer County | 44 | 44 | 45 | ||
Sacramento | 46 | 46 | 49 | ||
San Joaquin | 38 | 36 | 41 | R | |
Stanislaus | 40 | 40 | 44 | R | |
Tulare | 54 | 53 | 56 |
r = revised
Leading the way?® in California real estate for more than 100 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with 185,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
Vía Home http://ift.tt/211fIth