By MICHAEL KOLOMATSKY
2017 second-quarter sales data showed the borough’s home prices reached a new level.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vWmxpL
via IFTTT
By MICHAEL KOLOMATSKY
2017 second-quarter sales data showed the borough’s home prices reached a new level.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vWmxpL
via IFTTT
By Unknown Author
This week’s properties include a Tudor in Westfield, N.J. and a five-bedroom in Ossining, N.Y.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vLuWw4
via IFTTT
By Reported by JILL P. CAPUZZO and ANNE MANCUSO
This week’s properties include a Tudor in Westfield, N.J. and a five-bedroom in Ossining, N.Y.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vMzVwp
via IFTTT
By RONDA KAYSEN
The blog “Jeremiah’s Vanishing New York” has been a chronicle of loss for a decade.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vWgUb4
via IFTTT
By MICHELLE HIGGINS
To avoid an expensive remodeling job, try the tricks designers use.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vpoRnP
via IFTTT
By STEFANOS CHEN
In some New York neighborhoods, the housing stock is great, but turnover is so low, word of mouth is the best search engine.
Published: August 10, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2vVzKOP
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
C.A.R. recently rolled out its own Alexa Skill for Amazon Echo products.
With the free CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Skill, Alexa will:
• Play the Housing Matters Podcast
• Give quick real estate tips
• Track total home sales, avg. home price and avg. days on market in your area
• Stay on top of interest rates and origination fees
Download the free CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® Alexa Skill now on amazon.com for any Amazon Echo product!
Vía Home http://ift.tt/2uu1N8C
By JOYCE COHEN
Lucas Hunt wanted to rent an apartment in Brooklyn. To his surprise, he landed in Long Island City, Queens.
Published: August 9, 2017 at 05:00PM
from NYT Real Estate http://ift.tt/2wKv6jR
via IFTTT
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
For release:
August 9, 2017
Higher housing prices and tight inventory drag down California housing affordability; income required to buy doubles in five years
• Twenty-nine percent of California households could afford to purchase the $553,260 median-priced home in the second quarter of 2017, down from 32 percent in first-quarter 2017 and down from 31 percent in second-quarter 2016.
• A minimum annual income of $110,890 was needed to make monthly payments of $2,770, including principal, interest, and taxes on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at a 4.09 percent interest rate.
• Thirty-eight percent of home buyers were able to purchase the $443,400 median-priced condo or townhome. An annual income of $88,870 was required to make a monthly payment of $2,220.
LOS ANGELES (Aug. 9) – Higher home prices resulting from a severe lack of homes for sale and high demand during the hot home-buying season eroded California’s housing affordability in the second quarter, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (C.A.R.) said today.
The percentage of home buyers who could afford to purchase a median-priced, existing single-family home in California in second-quarter 2017 fell to 29 percent, down from 32 percent in the first quarter of 2017 and down from 31 percent in the second quarter a year ago, according to C.A.R.’s Traditional Housing Affordability Index (HAI). This is the 17th consecutive quarter that the index has been below 40 percent and the lowest since third-quarter 2015. California’s housing affordability index hit a peak of 56 percent in the first quarter of 2012.
C.A.R.’s HAI measures the percentage of all households that can afford to purchase a median-priced, single-family home in California. C.A.R. also reports affordability indices for regions and select counties within the state. The Index is considered the most fundamental measure of housing well-being for home buyers in the state.
A minimum annual income of $110,890 was needed to qualify for the purchase of a $553,260 statewide median-priced, existing single-family home in the second quarter of 2017. The monthly payment, including taxes and insurance on a 30-year, fixed-rate loan, would be $2,770, assuming a 20 percent down payment and an effective composite interest rate of 4.09 percent. The effective composite interest rate in first-quarter 2017 was 4.36 percent and 3.85 percent in the second quarter of 2016.
Home prices have nearly doubled since affordability reached its highest level five years ago, and compared to then, home buyers now need twice the income to purchase a median-priced home. In the first quarter of 2012, buyers statewide needed a minimum annual income of $56,320 to purchase a home that was priced $279,190. And in the San Francisco Bay Area, a home buyer needed a minimum annual income of $90,370 to purchase a $447,970 priced home just five years ago. Compare that to the current minimum income of $179,390 needed to purchase an $895,000 priced home now.
Condominiums and townhomes also were less affordable in second-quarter 2017 compared to the previous quarter. Thirty-eight percent of California households earned the minimum income to qualify for the purchase of a $443,400 median-priced condominium/townhome in the second quarter of 2017, and an annual income of $88,870 was required to make monthly payments of $2,220. Forty percent of households could afford to purchase the $414,840 priced condo or townhome in first-quarter 2017.
Key points from the second-quarter 2017 Housing Affordability report include:
• Compared to affordability in first-quarter 2017, only six of 43 counties tracked posted an improvement in housing affordability (Napa, Santa Barbara, San Benito, Mariposa/Tuolumne, Mendocino, and Sutter), 29 experienced a decline (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, San Diego, Ventura, Monterey, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, Placer, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Lake, Mendocino, Shasta, Yolo, Yuba), and eight were unchanged (Sonoma, Orange, Riverside, San Luis Obispo, Santa Cruz, Tulare, Humboldt, and Sutter).
• During the second quarter of 2017, the most affordable counties in California were Tehama (57 percent), Kern (54 percent), Sutter, (53 percent), Kings and Tulare (both at 52 percent).
• San Francisco (12 percent), San Mateo (14 percent), and Santa Barbara (16 percent), Santa Clara and Santa Cruz (both at 17 percent) counties were the least affordable areas in the state.
• Housing affordability figures are now available for the following counties: Amador, Butte, El Dorado, Humboldt, Lake, Mariposa and Tuolumne (combined), Mendocino, San Benito, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Yolo, and Yuba. See accompanying tables.
Housing Affordability slides (click link to open)
Affordability peak versus current
Annual required income peak vs. current
PITI peak versus current
Median home price peak vs. current
CA housing affordability by quarter (2006-2017)
Housing affordability by county
See C.A.R.’s historical housing affordability data.
See first-time buyer housing affordability data.
Leading the way?® in California real estate for more than 110 years, the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® (www.car.org) is one of the largest state trade organizations in the United States with more than190,000 members dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. C.A.R. is headquartered in Los Angeles.
# # #
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Second Quarter 2017
C.A.R. Region |
Housing Affordability Index |
Median Home Price |
Monthly Payment Including Taxes & Insurance |
Minimum Qualifying Income |
CA SFH (SAAR) | 29 |
$ 553,260 |
$ 2,770 |
$ 110,890 |
CA Condo/Townhomes | 38 |
$ 443,400 |
$ 2,220 |
$ 88,870 |
Los Angeles Metro Area | 31 |
$ 491,250 |
$ 2,460 |
$ 98,470 |
Inland Empire | 43 |
$ 342,050 |
$ 1,710 |
$ 68,560 |
S.F. Bay Area | 21 |
$ 895,000 |
$ 4,480 |
$ 179,390 |
S.F. Bay Area |
||||
Alameda | 19 |
$ 880,000 |
$ 4,410 |
$ 176,390 |
Contra-Costa (Central Cty) | 31 |
$ 655,000 |
$ 3,280 |
$ 131,290 |
Marin | 17 |
$ 1,302,500 |
$ 6,530 |
$ 261,070 |
Napa | 25 |
$ 683,000 |
$ 3,420 |
$ 136,900 |
San Francisco | 12 |
$ 1,450,000 |
$ 7,270 |
$ 290,630 |
San Mateo | 14 |
$ 1,469,000 |
$ 7,360 |
$ 294,440 |
Santa Clara | 17 |
$ 1,183,440 |
$ 5,930 |
$ 237,210 |
Solano | 44 |
$ 412,000 |
$ 2,060 |
$ 82,580 |
Sonoma | 25 |
$ 625,000 |
$ 3,130 |
$ 125,270 |
Southern California |
||||
Los Angeles | 28 |
$ 514,220 |
$ 2,580 |
$ 103,070 |
Orange County | 21 |
$ 788,000 |
$ 3,950 |
$ 157,950 |
Riverside County | 39 |
$ 380,000 |
$ 1,900 |
$ 76,170 |
San Bernardino | 51 |
$ 269,640 |
$ 1,350 |
$ 54,050 |
San Diego | 26 |
$ 605,000 |
$ 3,030 |
$ 121,260 |
Ventura | 27 |
$ 635,000 |
$ 3,180 |
$ 127,280 |
Central Coast |
||||
Monterey | 21 |
$ 603,000 |
$ 3,020 |
$ 120,860 |
San Luis Obispo | 26 |
$ 565,000 |
$ 2,830 |
$ 113,250 |
Santa Barbara | 16 |
$ 750,000 |
$ 3,760 |
$ 150,330 |
Santa Cruz | 17 |
$ 850,000 |
$ 4,260 |
$ 170,370 |
Central Valley |
||||
Fresno | 47 |
$ 250,000 |
$ 1,250 |
$ 50,110 |
Kern (Bakersfield) | 54 |
$ 232,500 |
$ 1,170 |
$ 46,600 |
Kings County | 52 |
$ 225,000 |
$ 1,130 |
$ 45,100 |
Madera | 44 |
$ 259,900 |
$ 1,300 |
$ 52,090 |
Merced | 48 |
$ 248,000 |
$ 1,240 |
$ 49,710 |
Placer County | 43 |
$ 465,000 |
$ 2,330 |
$ 93,200 |
Sacramento | 45 |
$ 340,000 |
$ 1,700 |
$ 68,150 |
San Benito | 33 |
$ 530,000 |
$ 2,660 |
$ 106,230 |
San Joaquin | 43 |
$ 336,940 |
$ 1,690 |
$ 67,540 |
Stanislaus | 47 |
$ 288,500 |
$ 1,450 |
$ 57,830 |
Tulare | 52 |
$ 220,000 |
$ 1,100 |
$ 44,100 |
Other Counties in California |
||||
Amador | 42 |
$ 340,000 |
$ 1,700 |
$ 68,150 |
Butte County | 39 |
$ 305,850 |
$ 1,530 |
$ 61,300 |
El Dorado County | 40 |
$ 480,000 |
$ 2,410 |
$ 96,210 |
Humboldt | 36 |
$ 299,000 |
$ 1,500 |
$ 59,930 |
Lake County | 38 |
$ 250,000 |
$ 1,250 |
$ 50,110 |
Mariposa And Tuolumne | 46 |
$ 284,390 |
$ 1,430 |
$ 57,000 |
Mendocino | 27 |
$ 400,000 |
$ 2,000 |
$ 80,180 |
Shasta | 47 |
$ 259,900 |
$ 1,300 |
$ 52,090 |
Siskiyou County | 47 |
$ 216,500 |
$ 1,080 |
$ 43,390 |
Sutter | 53 |
$ 271,000 |
$ 1,360 |
$ 54,320 |
Tehama | 57 |
$ 202,000 |
$ 1,010 |
$ 40,490 |
Yolo | 35 |
$ 430,000 |
$ 2,150 |
$ 86,190 |
Yuba | 43 |
$ 270,000 |
$ 1,350 |
$ 54,120 |
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Traditional Housing Affordability Index
Second Quarter 2017
STATE/REGION/COUNTY |
Q2 2017 |
Q1 2017 |
Q2 2016 |
||
CA SFH (SAAR) | 29 | 32 | 31 | ||
CA Condo/Townhomes | 38 | 40 | 40 | ||
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area | 31 | 33 | 33 | ||
Inland Empire | 43 | 43 | 46 | ||
S.F. Bay Area | 21 | 25 | 23 | r | |
S.F. Bay Area |
|||||
Alameda | 19 | 21 | 23 | r | |
Contra-Costa (Central County) | 31 | 37 | 35 | r | |
Marin | 17 | 18 | 18 | ||
Napa | 25 | 24 | 26 | ||
San Francisco | 12 | 13 | 13 | ||
San Mateo | 14 | 15 | 14 | ||
Santa Clara | 17 | 19 | 19 | ||
Solano | 44 | 45 | 45 | ||
Sonoma | 25 | 25 | 26 | ||
Southern California |
|||||
Los Angeles | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
Orange County | 21 | 21 | 22 | ||
Riverside County | 39 | 39 | 41 | ||
San Bernardino | 51 | 52 | 56 | ||
San Diego | 26 | 28 | 28 | r | |
Ventura | 27 | 28 | r | 33 | r |
Central Coast |
|||||
Monterey | 21 | 23 | 25 | ||
San Luis Obispo | 26 | 26 | 27 | ||
Santa Barbara | 16 | 14 | 19 | r | |
Santa Cruz | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||
Central Valley |
|||||
Fresno | 47 | 48 | 48 | r | |
Kern (Bakersfield) | 54 | 55 | 55 | r | |
Kings County | 52 | 53 | 54 | r | |
Madera | 44 | 47 | 51 | r | |
Merced | 48 | 50 | 51 | r | |
Placer County | 43 | 45 | 47 | r | |
Sacramento | 45 | 46 | 46 | r | |
San Benito | 33 | 32 | 36 | ||
San Joaquin | 43 | 45 | 45 | ||
Stanislaus | 47 | 48 | 48 | ||
Tulare | 52 | 52 | 50 | ||
Other Counties in California |
|||||
Amador | 42 | 47 | 50 | ||
Butte County | 39 | 41 | 43 | ||
El Dorado County | 40 | 43 | 38 | ||
Humboldt | 36 | 36 | 42 | r | |
Lake County | 38 | 43 | 44 | ||
Mariposa And Tuolumne | 46 | 45 | 51 | ||
Mendocino | 27 | 26 | 34 | r | |
Shasta | 47 | 49 | 48 | r | |
Siskiyou County | 47 | 48 | 54 | r | |
Sutter | 53 | 53 | 55 | r | |
Tehama | 57 | 55 | 60 | ||
Yolo | 35 | 37 | 36 | r | |
Yuba | 43 | 44 | 47 | r |
r = revised
Vía Home http://ift.tt/2us7UGv
http://ift.tt/eA8V8J
WASHINGTON – The number of very poor unsubsidized families struggling to pay their monthly rent and who may also be living in substandard housing increased between 2013 and 2015, according to a new report released today by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Vía HUD Press Releases http://ift.tt/2upAxrJ